Guesnay, Jean-Baptiste; Denys, de la Sainte Baume : Provinciae Massiliensis ac reliquae Phocensis annales sive Massilia gentilis et Christian [suivi de] Response a une lettre intitulée : Les sentimens de M. Jean Lannoy, &c. sur le livre que le P. Guesnay Jesuite a fait imprimer à Lyon sous le nom de Pierre Henry, & intitulée : Auctarium historicum de Magdalena Massiliensi advena

Criticum Lip[anomailigem. 69 ,H"i,1ni non videtur fu:{fc cr:lITa, neque affeébta, Ccd probabilis & nroinde excll[ans à mort"" . . '.' .fi . . .' r ~.I peccato. Ipk en1111 bebar Poml ccm non dcfimlllfl tanqllam de hde , & fimul \'idcbac [ecum [corire C . " a . E' ft 00C1- Hum C.':0pl Ha • rl~coForllm:. Q::?circa B.Allgutl:inlls. c1arè ~o~ct venialirer [olum peccalfe , & [11ua Au' . chantarc, & ILl II b1ce martyrlJ [actle purgarllln. Tum lflfra ,hcn, hoc eiHS peaatmnfitiffè q~tafj nd!.U :gU.lt~.I~ . d . Î. "'t· b h" . 'JJ~ 'J- l-t'fn, c'ntrr..DonR '.! l.m. 0; e t 1l1Cd anmJi!. qlterr: ~ era c ar:tatts conttngfbt!lnt. Ex aItera r:lllll n pane \ ider ur morc lIter tl/l. CliP. 1 g•• P('(.1.. Ife, (Hm pr;;-~c~pto prcllo Apof1:ol'lo non paruerir, & fine modo POl1rificcm rct1:è [cnrienrcm & J9. ','X;1'!U ~e. r I.Lm pdl S' ephanu5 non ddil1luerü rcm illam tanquam de fide,ramen [erio pr<ecepir,vr non 'c~. P'iJ.H, 1. ur hndlcl, quo~ C)prianus ipCc f.lterur in Epiilola ad Pompcium , cui mandaro oarere d~bJ.l'( ~Yl'ri"l L.S , & Cubiicere iudicimn Cllum iudicio fupcl'ioris [ui , & fj,!cem debuir non pr~ferre A.~~ ..ep'47' .1.. L' \' l' SI" . 4d Ylncen. ver 0: COIJ(lll11UIO .1 qtl::t la proru H contra reF :janl1m Papam 111 cplfiola ad PompelUlTI , vbi voel[ eum f~p_Olburn, ir~periCllm , cœcx 1.~ praLJ.~ mcn~ls, &c'. Ieaq~e B. ~ugl1fbnus alit r conatur Cypria- Hum deh:ndcre,aHerens vd Ilon e(fc Ipfius lila fCflpta, vbl h:rc muemuntur, vel eum pofiea pœniruilIè erroris, & mmaiTe [ellcemiam ante morrem , licer rcrraétacio non inueniaîur. Inrelligir Launo_ ~llS ql1id dicam , & in qu~m Llp[anomaftigem Hl:<ec pl'oprij iudicij & inobedic:nricr: cuditur hba. S . • RmfllS obiiciul1t h<eretieî , mu1rortlm reliqyias proponi venerandas in publico, qui non modo non iant1:i [ed nec homines fl1ewnt, vr Chri flophorus, Geol'gius, Cacharina , y rCula,&c. Superfiitio– tus igirur cllicos dt earum, qua: fuppoml11cur ipfis re1Jquiarum. Ira rariocinacur Melanéton in Apo– log.un.2 1. Confeffionis Allgufiana: , & Caluinus in lib.de racione verre reformarionis EccleGcr; , vd etiam pl' [olida [ua. modefiia S.Dominicl1m carnificem , S.Medardum & quofdam alios, bejllM, San– Cros vero genel':ltim manJ/ra appellac. Conrpil'ar Launoyus in hoc eriam,Caluinian<e Lipiànomafiigia= c;lpHe Cllm Melanélone : nihil enil1'l magis 1I1clllcat pag.70' & 71.quàm [abu/am ejJè , Mllgdalm.e ( cu. jus l'ehqui~s Sanmaximini veneramur ) in GalliM nafJig4tiomm, in qua ner: verifimiles ru cominemur. Qpid memorem,inquir,Sanéliffimol homines, q~tos genI imrnanitllte barba 'rit proprju finibus expu/it , 0711– nes in G.r/lia caflellü,villis vrbibus, ampliffirnis EccleJiü & opibus ditatfJs ! Q.uiJ MIf.JJililt, Ducem di eiHs tI.1:or~m, q.los Mp!gdalena ad Chri]ti reli.gJonern fua pr.t.dicAtione pel/exit, &c. .Q3id dmique exprornt!lm C.:r.lCïtl cum'bw Ilnimifque abfitrda, imo nec digna QIS.e dijèutiantur vel rifu. Pag-48. Caluini exemplo , pro u)lida crj:l~:1 [ua modeH::ia S. Anronin1l111 & viras plel'ofque alios religioiiffimos ftrua peco.rlf. & muiDs l -nomll1!( C.. ompclht. Commentitias dlè, aieJordidas, vanas,leuesJurileCque reliqujas ornnes Laza– 11,tv.axlmini,M.mhx,Magd:llen.e; quos fillgimus , guiqye in Prouillcia Phocenfi nulli homines fue– mnr. Refllgio angnem comprelfum, & tam honcndos affiarus. 6. Ad Bdlal mll1l!111 l'elego arlllerfarillln, \' r omnia planè , qu<e pro rninuenda Romanorum Pontif1- Cl1l:n amorira.rc_in dcfiniendis qLlxf1:ioniblls ~aéli, & qLl::: concra reliquiar~m Mag,d~lcn<e ~ofir<e vene- f~~'Jr~~~;: rarJonem ab IplJS appLObatam , & v[u Ecdeh.:e commLJl1l recept~m opponlt , fLlse & exp1Jcare eadem Beatitud. in Melanétonis & Cnluini Cccipta refundenrem ac dilLlelltem. cen[orem, pr~feétul1l moribus & Ma- ClJp.2.0. gif1:rum veteris di[çjplinre acfeueritatis inueniat. Sanéto1ll111 , inquit, quorurndam hi{l:ori~ etfi apo- cl'yphœ quidem & inccrtre fint , non camen propt:::l'ea S1néti ip fi l111ilquam fllerunt. Nam tî ira al'gu- rnentari lice~r) pierique ApofloH inter Sanétos nurnerari non porc:rum, quoniam hif1:oriœ, qll:r Fi run- tur vel ex Abdi:l. vcl ex aliis vcplurimum non flint prorCus indubitaue. Habernws quid min Euangelio vocationem Apof1:o10rum, & payca quxcbm ex vira.ipCorum;necnon fœliccl)) dol'mirionern S. lacobi M:tioris Afro. J l, S.Petri prœdithm ll10rrem glorio{am à Domino 10:111.21. At aliolum Apoflo!orllm nnem ex diui l1S lircris non habemlls. ~ocirca Gebfim P.lpa Cano Sanéta Romana, Difi:.I 5. hillo- riam S.Gcor~~lj inrer apocryphas nmnetar , & canJen Sallétl1111 .pC1l111 Georgium colendum ellè af.l1l'- ln lf qL1la el 11 apocl'ypha erat hif1:oria, qua: runc exrabat , non ra nen apocrypha efi confuecudo vni- lI(:l l a l ):. EcclcG:r, quia Cemper Geol'gij ,Chrifiophori, CarhacÎn<c , Vrfulx, Gellr ac Magdalen<e nof1:r=e ;"(:11 -llje Maffilienlis memol'ia cdeberrima fuÎt. Baronij verba allegaife imo vero exCcripGffe inemi- ni qtJt'nadmodum ex his al1[am calumniand.i naéb [unt NOllaro~es , vc fieur l~ulrè ira & ternerè dice- Bar.in PUt. r 'nt, non p;tucas crre l'eliquias CuppoGtit.ias & .fitras , Ca(h_olico{q~e q~ibu[dam illu li ffc p~'<efii~iis, vt Martyr. c.4~ fi'cquentt'r Vl1iL,S Sanéti corpus diuerfis mloclS nad.erent ilrum dIe, lonOL'antes vel ne[clte dlffimu- Lllltcs,nns nol1 dlcere in dillcrfis Cepulchris vnum idcmque inc~grum e~ corpus [ed in fingulis , vt di. dum eft, icplllchris vnius Sanéti conCel'ual'i relitluias , ac proindc eidem honol'em eLllndem impendi ac ii inrcg' Lhl1 cilee corpus. • um. 1 I. ~od opiniones in eo libro pYOpltgn4t.t inclifUlrent ad h4reflm) &c. s C H 0 LlO N 1I. - t. H&reCeôn hic 11be llotatn confinia, & viciniratcs in opinionibus Launoyanis. Ponic qU<ell:i~ I1cm LipCanomaflix pag'4I. An aGcur:lcre [cripriones. ifice, ficl1~ ~ in l'cbu Magdal.enx .cognol– ccndls arque tl'aéhndis f1:udia in fruélu fim habenda? uglllat (:rudltlffim;lm arque re1JglOldIimam P.GueCnœi Di[quifirioncm inanitatis & falficaris. Lucubroiltioi1iJ, inquit , eùt[modi qui5 qllltfo filtHrtlJ ~jJ fmilus? qUd!. vtilitaJ? Viri doEli non legcnt,i.gnltri negLigcnt , aHt leEli~ne infmullbunt1w '. t/lntum Ab~fi 'VI ad Ecclefiaflicantm rerum & traditionHrn veritAtcm Ùiformcnt14r. Q;.lld vero efi , qllOd 111e moretur do– él:rinam & vlfrutcm iplius tu probes an improbes ? Non dica.m quid de ei~~ in Chnfbanam Rempu– blicl.ln meritis pronumient ali) iudicio & erndirione pr<c ftan~e~ , qUI PlfqUl htl?nem lUS l .ge.l'unt ,Ced iaqu ln tu) volant~( e , iam enim de hoc arglll11~nW [uPL! 1Junu 111 Pl'oromlO, uoJ cH: lans. Chry- .. fOitOl U e-Médiathèque | Histoire Provence | YF_038 (3)